From the Economist Nov.20, 1993:

Every autmn for the past ten years, an increasingly bad-tempered squabble 
has raged between, on the one hand, many of Britian's art critics and its 
popular media, and on the other, its avant-grade "establishment," the 
small croterie of art historians, curators, and dealers who control the 
Turner prize.
	This year is unlikely to be any different.  Four artists are 
short-listed for this year's &20,000 ($30,000) prize.  Examples of their 
work are on display at London's Tate Gallery until November 28th, and the 
winner will be announced live on television on November 23rd.  A counter 
prize of &40,000 will, bizarrely, be awarded to the short-listed artist 
deemed to have produced the worst work in the preceeding year.  The sum 
comes from the k Foundation, a prank outfit run by wealthy pop musicians 
aiming to stir up mischief in what they see as the grossly materialistic 
art wold.
	..But if Ms Whiteread, as some critics expect, wins both the Turner
and K [Foundation] prizes, the vast numbers of people who equate
contemporary art with rubbish will, yet again, feel vindicated.