From: owner-abolition-usa-digest@lists.xmission.com (abolition-usa-digest) To: abolition-usa-digest@lists.xmission.com Subject: abolition-usa-digest V1 #284 Reply-To: abolition-usa-digest Sender: owner-abolition-usa-digest@lists.xmission.com Errors-To: owner-abolition-usa-digest@lists.xmission.com Precedence: bulk abolition-usa-digest Friday, April 7 2000 Volume 01 : Number 284 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 06:38:03 -0400 From: Ellen Thomas Subject: (abolition-usa) NucNews 00/04/06: DC Hearings - --=====================_89531383==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (1) April 7, 2000 Washington Times http://www.washtimes.com/national/daybook-20004721156.htm Environmental summit =97 9 a.m. =97 The U.S. Chamber of Commerce Environment and Regulatory Affairs Division holds its "Environmental Summit 2000." Utah Gov. Michael O. Leavitt, National Governors Association chairman, delivers the keynote address. Location: 1615 H St. NW. Contact: 202/463-5682. Asian economics discussion =97 noon =97 The Council on Foreign Relations holds a discussion, "Securing the Sustainability of Asia's Economic Recovery." The speaker is Tadao Chino, Asian Development Bank president. Location: St. Regis Hotel, 16th and K streets NW. Contact: 212/434-9537. [Downwinders, here's one for you...] Reno speech =97 12:40 p.m. =97Attorney General Janet Reno addresses the National Organization for Victims' Assistance. Location: 2237 Rayburn House Office Building. Contact: 202/616-2771. - -----=20 (2) NUCLEAR PLANT PERFORMANCE REVIEWS ON LINE AmeriScan: April 6, 2000 http://ens.lycos.com/ens/apr2000/2000L-04-06-09.html WASHINGTON, DC, April 6, 2000 (ENS) - The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has completed its Plant Performance Reviews (PPRs) for 90 nuclear power plants and is making them available on the NRC web site. Thirteen nuclear plants, which participated in a pilot test of the agency's revised reactor oversight process, received their performance assessments late last year. PPRs are an interim measure the NRC has used to assess nuclear power plant safety, after suspending the Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance in 1998 while it developed a revised reactor oversight process. PPRs consist of an in depth, integrated assessment of overall plant performance. The primary purpose of these reviews is to evaluate safety performance information and identify any changes in plant performance so NRC can allocate inspection resources. The text of each PPR letter is available from the NRC Office of Public Affairs and has been posted at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.=20 An important element of the previous SALP process was the public meeting the NRC conducted with the licensee to discuss the assessment results. During the interim process, the NRC has continued its practice of meeting publicly with licensees to discuss its performance assessments. Most plants have had recent public meetings and therefore few meetings will be scheduled for these PPRs. These PPRs mark the last assessments before initial implementation begins this month of the revised reactor oversight process. Under the new program, the NRC will conduct quarterly reviews of performance indicators and inspection findings and issue semi-annual assessments and updates to each plant's inspection plans. A full description of the revised reactor oversight process is available at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm or http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/index.html ___________________________________________________ NucNews Archives: http://prop1.org/nucnews/briefslv.htm Today's Newspapers: http://prop1.org/nucnews/links.htm Submit Letter/Notice/Article: mailto:prop1@prop1.org (NucNews-Editor) About NucNews: http://prop1.org/nucnews/nucnews.htm E-Mail Archive: http://www.onelist.com/archive/NucNews Subscribe: mailto:prop1@prop1.org (NucNews-Subscribe) Here are excellent e-mail news resources (free, by subscription, for educational purposes, in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107.): DOE Watch - doewatch@onelist.com | http://members.aol.com/doewatch=20 Downwinders - downwinders@onelist.com | http://downwinders@onelist.com=20 EnviroNews - environews@envirolink.org|http://www.envirolink.org/environews= =20 Planet Ark - mailto:anna@planetark.org|http://www.planetark.org/news/ Radbull (Radiation Bulletin for Activists) - mailto:rogerh@energy-net.org Distributed without payment for research and educational=20 purposes only, by subscription, and archived for the use of all, in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107. - --=====================_89531383==_.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
(1)  April 7, 2000 Washington Times
http://www.washtimes.com/national/daybook-20004721156.htm<= /a>

    Environmental summit =97 9 a.m. =97
            = ;         The U.S. Chamber of Commerce
            = ;         Environment and Regulatory Affairs
            = ;         Division holds its "Environmental
            = ;         Summit 2000." Utah Gov. Michael O.
            = ;         Leavitt, National Governors
            = ;         Association chairman, delivers the
            = ;         keynote address. Location: 1615 H St.
            = ;         NW. Contact: 202/463-5682. Asian
            = ;         economics discussion =97 noon =97 The
            = ;         Council on Foreign Relations holds a
            = ;         discussion, "Securing the Sustainability
            = ;         of Asia's Economic Recovery." The
            = ;         speaker is Tadao Chino, Asian
            = ;         Development Bank president. Location:
            = ;         St. Regis Hotel, 16th and K streets NW.
            = ;         Contact: 212/434-9537.

[Downwinders, here's one for you...]

            = ;            &nb= sp; Reno speech =97 12:40 p.m.
            = ;         =97Attorney General Janet Reno
            = ;         addresses the National Organization for
            = ;         Victims' Assistance. Location: 2237
            = ;         Rayburn House Office Building.
            = ;         Contact: 202/616-2771.

-----

(2)  NUCLEAR PLANT PERFORMANCE REVIEWS ON LINE

AmeriScan: April 6, 2000
http://ens.lycos.com/ens/apr2000/2000L-04-06-09.html
            = ;     WASHINGTON, DC, April 6, 2000 (ENS) - The
            = ;     Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has
            = ;     completed its Plant Performance Reviews (PPRs)
            = ;     for 90 nuclear power plants and is making them
            = ;     available on the NRC web site. Thirteen nuclear
            = ;     plants, which participated in a pilot test of the
            = ;     agency's revised reactor oversight process,
            = ;     received their performance assessments late last
            = ;     year. PPRs are an interim measure the NRC has
            = ;     used to assess nuclear power plant safety, after
            = ;     suspending the Systematic Assessment of
            = ;     Licensee Performance in 1998 while it developed
            = ;     a revised reactor oversight process. PPRs consist
            = ;     of an in depth, integrated assessment of overall
            = ;     plant performance. The primary purpose of these
            = ;     reviews is to evaluate safety performance
            = ;     information and identify any changes in plant
            = ;     performance so NRC can allocate inspection
            = ;     resources. The text of each PPR letter is
            = ;     available from the NRC Office of Public Affairs
            = ;     and has been posted at:
            = ;     http://www.nrc.gov/O= PA/ppr.

            = ;     An important element of the previous SALP
            = ;     process was the public meeting the NRC
            = ;     conducted with the licensee to discuss the
            = ;     assessment results. During the interim process,
            = ;     the NRC has continued its practice of meeting
            = ;     publicly with licensees to discuss its performance
            = ;     assessments. Most plants have had recent public
            = ;     meetings and therefore few meetings will be
            = ;     scheduled for these PPRs. These PPRs mark the
            = ;     last assessments before initial implementation
            = ;     begins this month of the revised reactor
            = ;     oversight process. Under the new program, the
            = ;     NRC will conduct quarterly reviews of
            = ;     performance indicators and inspection findings
            = ;     and issue semi-annual assessments and updates
            = ;     to each plant's inspection plans. A full
            = ;     description of the revised reactor oversight
            = ;     process is available at:
            = ;     http://www.nr= c.gov/OPA/primer.htm or
            = ;     http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/index.html

    = ___________________________________________________

NucNews Archives: http://prop1.org/nucnews/briefslv.htm
Today's Newspapers: http://prop1.org/nucnews/links.htm
Submit Letter/Notice/Article: mailto:prop1@prop1.org (NucNews-Editor)
About NucNews: http://prop1.org/nucnews/nucnews.htm
E-Mail Archive: http://www.onelist.com/archive/NucNews
Subscribe:  mailto:prop1@prop1.org (NucNews-Subscribe)

Here are excellent e-mail news resources (free, by subscription, for= educational purposes, in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107.):

DOE Watch -
doewatch@onelist.com |= http://members.aol.com/doewatch
Downwinders - downwinders@onelist.com |= http://downwinders@onelist.com
EnviroNews - environews@envirolink.org|http://www.envirolink.org/environews
Planet Ark - mailto:anna@planetark.org|http://www.planetark.org/news/
Radbull (Radiation Bulletin for Activists) - mailto:rogerh@energy-net.org

      Distributed without payment for= research and educational
   purposes only, by subscription, and archived for the use of= all,
             in= accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107.


- --=====================_89531383==_.ALT-- - - To unsubscribe to abolition-usa, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe abolition-usa" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 15:07:50 -0500 From: Kevin Martin Subject: (abolition-usa) Fail Safe action alert =93We=92re to blame, both of us. We let our machines get out of hand...W= hat we put between us, we can remove.=94 -the president, played by Henry Fonda, to the Soviet premier in the original 1964 movie version of Fail Safe Dear Friends, The quote above is the message of Fail Safe, and it=92s even more urgent today. If we the people demand the worldwide elimination of nuclear weapons, it can and will happen. While it may seem odd to organize around a television show, we have gotten an enthusiastic response to our watch party campaign from activists around the country (also in Canada and Argentina!) and from the media. So here's an activist to-do list: 1. Even if you aren't hosting or attending a watch party, tune in to CBS television for the live remake of the anti-nuclear thriller this Sunday night at 9:00 eastern, 8:00 central, 7:00 mountain, and 9:00 pacific times. 2. Write a letter to President Clinton demanding he take action to eliminate nuclear weapons worldwide. A sample letter can be found at www.disarmament.org/presltr.htm 3. Call the White House Monday (202/456-1111 or 202/456-1414) on National Fail Safe Call-In Day with the same message. We need to jam the White House phone lines! A flier for the call-in can be found at http://www.fourthfreedom.org/hottopic/fail_safe_poster.htm If you can make two more calls, call the Bush and Gore campaigns and demand that they address nuclear disarmament in the presidential campaign. Bush HQ: (512) 637-2000, Gore HQ: (615) 340-2000. 4. Even if you aren't holding a house party, contact local media and offer yourself or someone from your peace group as a spokesperson to respond to Fail Safe. Priority contacts are your local CBS station and local newspapers. A few talking points: We need to be careful not to allow anyone to dismiss Fail Safe as a Cold War anachronism. There are still 35,000 nuclear warheads worldwide. While the scenario in Fail Safe of nuclear bombers on 24-hour alert no longer applies, the reality is we are in a worse situation with our missiles on 24-hour hair-trigger alert, ready to be launched on a few minutes notice, able to strike their targets less then 30 minutes after launch. The timing of this action, just a few days after the latest U.S. hypocritical (I mean subcritical) nuclear test and just a few weeks before the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference, couldn't be better. Politicians and the media think nobody cares about the nuclear threat anymore. Here's a chance to raise our voices. Let's not miss it. In Peace, Kevin Martin Director, Project Abolition "There is no way to peace. Peace is the way." -A.J. Muste PLEASE RE-POST AND CIRCULATE WIDELY! - - To unsubscribe to abolition-usa, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe abolition-usa" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 16:57:28 -0400 From: ASlater Subject: (abolition-usa) Fwd: UN Secretary-General's report to Millennium General Assembly Dear Friends, I think we should all write to Kofi Annan and support his idea for a conference on nuclear disarmament. Write to him at: The United Nations New York, NY 10017 > >Excerpt from UN Secretary-General's new report to the >Millennium General Assembly. > >Nuclear weapons > >248. Let me now turn to nuclear weapons. When the bipolar balance of >nuclear terror passed into history, the concern with nuclear weapons also >seemed to drift from public consciousness. But some 35,000 nuclear weapons >remain in the arsenals of the nuclear powers, with thousands still deployed >on hair-trigger alert. Whatever rationale these weapons may once have had >has long since dwindled. Political, moral and legal constraints on >actually >using them further undermine their strategic utility without, howver, >reducing the risks of inadvertent war or proliferation. > >249. The objective of nuclear non-proliferation is not helped by the fact >that the nuclear weapon states continue to insist that those weapons in >their hands enhance security, while in the hands of others they are a >threat >to world peace. > >250. If we were making steady progress towards disarmament, this situation >would be less alarming. Unfortunately the reverse is true. Not only are >the Strategic Arms Reduction Talks stalled, but there are no negotiations >at all covering the many thousands of so-called tactical nuclear weapons in >existence, or the weapons of any nuclear power other than those of the >Russian Federation and the United States of America. > >251. Moreover, unless plans to deploy missile defences are devised with >the >agreement of all concerned parties, the progress achieved thus far in >reducing the number of nuclear weapons may be jeopardized. >Confidence-building is required to reassure states that their nuclear >deterrent capabilities will not be negated. > >252. Above all else, we need a reaffirmation of political commitment at >the >highest levels to reducing the dangers that arise both from existing >nuclear >weapons and from further proliferation. > >253. To help focus attention on the risks we confront and on the >opportunities we have to reduce them, I propose that consideration be given >to convening a major international conference that would help to identify >ways of eliminating nuclear dangers. > > > >Suzanne Pearce, Coordinator >Middle Powers Initiative >727 Massachusetts Avenue >Cambridge, MA 02139, USA >Tel: 617 492-9189 Fax: 617 868-2560 >MPI webpage: www.middlepowers.org > Alice Slater Global Resource Action Center for the Environment (GRACE) 15 East 26th Street, Room 915 New York, NY 10010 tel: (212) 726-9161 fax: (212) 726-9160 email: aslater@gracelinks.org http://www.gracelinks.org GRACE is a member of Abolition 2000, a global network for the elimination nuclear weapons. - - To unsubscribe to abolition-usa, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe abolition-usa" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 20:10:00 -0700 From: "David Crockett Williams" Subject: (abolition-usa) *by10Apr!! Comment on DOE Energy Strategic Plan2000 I am not sure what the distinction here is between the "New National Energy Policy Plan" (CNES Comprehensive National Energy Strategy) prepared by DOE after three public hearings in 1998 and submitted by President Clinton to Congress, , and the below described "DOE Energy Strategic Plan" apparently open to public comments since 8Feb2000 at invitation of Secretary Richardson but only today appearing in the realm of one of my email interest groups and indicating a deadline of three days from now of Monday, April 10, 2000 (apparently extended from March 31, 2000) courtesy of Mr. Wiggins (cc above). I would suggest to Mr. Wiggins and DOE by this email, and those in agreement following copied to , that this deadline should be extended to the end of April 2000 so as to take advantage of the "Clean Energy Now!" campaign being fostered by the EarthDay2000 events across country so that this network of activists including many clean energy experts have a chance to offer their public input. I am again disappointed at the low degree of public outreach apparently effected by DOE on this most important matter of our national energy strategy revisions especially in light of the mounting evidence of imminent global warming environmental catastrophes at hand in the coming few years and I most urgently ask for such public input deadline extension to end of April 2000. I would at least have expected DOE to notify public commenters on 1998 CNES about this new public input solicitiation. I was among a small number of people who found out in time to offer oral and written testimony to DOE CNES hearings in 1998 and my public comments were excerpted on p55 of first draft and p57 of final draft April 1998 as "One commenter recommended that DOE look into zero-point energy and referred to a specific technology for harnessing it called the "N" machine. He challenged the Secretary of Energy to fully investigate this technology and let the American public know about it." [ ] One of the two people I was able to alert in time to testify at the last public hearing on CNES, in Washington DC chaired by Secretary Pena, Thomas Valone of Integrity Research Institue, got some of his recommendations included in CNES public comments record following the above remarks as "Another commenter encouraged DOE to form an office for emerging technologies. The commenter explained that truly new groundbreaking technologies would emerge only when an office is established to engage scientists and researchers who are on the fringe of technology." The other person I alerted who testified there, William Thomas of Proposition One in Washington DC, on February 19, 1998, queried the Energy Secretary as to DOE position on these new clean energy technologies, "Allegedly, this new genre of zero point energy technology needs no fuel, is freely available, and is free of pollution. Assuming this is true, obviously this technology would entirely replace fossil and nuclear power and form the foundation of the optimal national, even international, energy policy." and Secretary Pena ordered a letter sent to him which was received dated May 12, 1998, over the signature of Robert W. Gee, Assistant Secretary, DOE Office of Policy and International Affairs, after he submitted additional written comments on February 25, 1998 and sent a letter to his Congressperson April 29, 1998 asking for her help . This letter of May 12, 1998, closed with the comment "If you have further questions, please contact Ehsan Khan of the Office of Energy Research at (202) 586-4785" [Dr. Khan referred David Hamilton or David Goodwin as the new DOE point of contact on 20Sep99] The letter contained an attachment describing the DOE's recent acceptance of evidence for the potential of the idea of Zero-Point Energy (ZPE) devices saying, "The energy associated with the ZPE is known to be essentially inexhaustible and ubiquitous, so a question that arises in the mind of the technologist is whether such energy can be 'mined' for practical use and thereby constitute the "Holy Grail" of energy research. " I subsequently solicited from my network additional input to Dr. Khan, as the then point of contact at DOE, on these emerging energy technologies and additional information was offered by Thomas Bearden, Hal Fox, and Eugene Mallove, which resulted in an expressed interest and faint hope that the DOE would further investigate more seriously the other variations on this new clean-energy genre also known under the various names of Cold Fusion, High Density Charge Clusters, and the Low Energy Nuclear Transmutation devices proven to neutralize radioactive wastes as well as liberating energy apparently/possibly from the ZPE. Due to the controversial nature of this new science which was until recently well ahead of contemporary theoretical physics now being evaluated by Sarfatti, et al, no apparent progress has been made towards updating new Energy Secretary Richardson on these developments. Or possibly, as claimed by journalist Jeane Manning in her book about some of these technologies, The Coming Energy Revolution, there is in another department (DOD?) a "dual-use" secrecy restriction hampering their public development while evidence exists that the new science behind them is being developed covertly inside and outside the US for advanced electromagnetic weaponry. I am submitting below my recent brief summary of these new emerging clean-energy technologies to replace nuclear and fossil fuel power and neutralize radioactive wastes, in the form of my appeal for this issue to become a mainstream issue in this year's political arena for national elections in November. The text of my DOE CNES 1998 hearing testimony and following written public comments detailing these arguments/data in context of CNES codifications is posted at http://www.egroups.com/group/williams-peltier/8.html I fully agree with Dr. O'Leary that we need a global emergency level "crash-program" (a "New Manhattan Project" analog) to rapidly complete research and development on optimum emerging energy technologies for immediate deployment to address global climate change before it is too late. I also agree with his assessment of the need for relegalization and widespread cultivation of the industrial hemp plant to replace the need to cut trees and as the most efficient biofuels source. Even if we had these new clean-energy technologies fully implemented today, this would only slow the present atmospheric degradation because so many trees have already been cut. To reverse the greenhouse effect and replenish atmospheric oxygen needed to heal the ozone layer depletion we need to rapidly regreen the planet with a global emergency level program that would best include a contemporary revival of the USDA's 1941-45 "Hemp for Victory" program that was implemented in spite of the 1937 fraud on the American Congress and people by which hemp was outlawed as marijuana. http://www.jackherer.com http://www.chrisconrad.com With the US now beginning to commit itself to another "Vietnam War", in Columbia striving for oil resources access/protection while deploying purportedly ongoing Iran/Contra-style CIA drugwar strategies/skullduggery http://www.egroups.com/message/global-peace-walk/318 in this year of High Level Oil Prices & DrugWar Electioneering, all these issues need to be reexamined carefully in light of hidden history coming to light http://www.copvcia.com - -----Original Message----- From: carl.wiggins@gsa.gov To: greenbuilding@crest.org ; green-power@crest.org Date: Friday, April 07, 2000 1:56 PM Subject: GP: Your turn to comment on DOE Energy Strategic Plan >YOUR TURN: COMMENT ON OUR PLANS FOR THE FUTURE. >A draft copy of STRENGTH THROUGH SCIENCE: POWERING THE 21ST CENTURY, the > Energy Departments strategic plan is available on the world wide web for > public comment through Monday, April 10. This draft will evolve into a > final Strategic Plan through consultation with you. DOE plans to publish a > final version of the plan this Spring with your help. This document > outlines the agencys long-term directions and policies. It establishes the > mission, objectives, performance goals and strategies for the department. > It is available at www.doe.gov/strategic_plan > > >___________________________________________________________________________ _ >This discussion group is sponsored in part by: >* Center for Renewable Energy and Sustainable Technology, http://www.crest.org >* Global Environmental Options, http://www.geonetwork.org >Archives and related documents can be found at at: http://www.green-power.com > From: David Crockett Williams To: EarthDay2000 Chris Curtis Cc: Baseline Mansion ; *Global Peace Walk Project Subject: Clean-Energy Campaign 2000 Date: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 9:41 PM From: David Crockett Williams To: Nader for President Subject: Important: New-Energy Science can win Presidency Date: Friday, March 10, 2000 1:24 PM Dear Nader for President Campaign 2000, Green Party, Mr. Ralph Nader, et al: I saw Ralph Nader on CSPAN yesterday speaking at University of Maryland College Park, listened carefully to his message and responses to questioners, and suggest you read very carefully the extremely important information below which can help greatly the success of his US Presidential Campaign and/or the campaign of any understanding candidate. I am emailing to suggest strongly that he investigate and include in his Presidential Campaign issue under the banner of "Clean Energy Now!" (EarthDay2000 slogan) the need for adequate funding to finish the research and development on the new so-called "free-energy" or "new-energy" technologies to replace nuclear and fossil fuel power, as for example, one class of which (devices to harness the "Zero Point Energy" field of the space in which matter resides) made passing mention on p.57 in the public comments section of the new national energy policy plan (CNES Comprehensive National Energy Strategy http://www.hr.doe.gov/nesp/cnes.html ) prepared by the DOE and submitted to Congress in 1998 to address Kyoto protocol goals for US energy industry carbon emissions to ameliorate global climate change. In addition, in a formal scientific letter to our representative ordered by then Energy Secretary Pena, in May 1998 the DOE acknowledged the existence of the Zero Point Energy field and called such potential devices to harness it the "Holy Grail of energy research" (for details and copy of this DOE letter, see story and follow links from "energy" button at bottom of http://www.prop1.org ). Further, I would strongly urge Mr. Nader to consult on this matter with those cc'd above including former astronaut and physicist/astronomer Dr. Brian O'Leary (cc above) who was the science and energy policy advisor and speechwriter to four previous US presidential candidates (beginning with Udall and ending with Jackson) before in recent years becoming familiar with many of these new energy technologies and their inventors/researchers and then writing a popular book about them called "Miracle in the Void" and the foreword to Canadian journalist Jeane Manning's book on some of these inventions and researchers called "The Coming Energy Revolution". (I suggest you start with Appendix II in O'Leary's book which is a speech of his from 1994 with good overview, entitled "Green Power") http://www.maui.net/~oleary A "flip-side" benefit to one class of this new genre of fuel-less energy technologies, a class (related to what was initially labeled "cold fusion" and then suppressed/debunked publicly before the last decade of quiet serious research has shown its underlying working principles proven sound) including labels of "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions" and "High Density Charge Clusters", has actually demonstrated the ability to neutralize radioactive wastes rapidly as was shown on ABC Good Morning America news in early June 1997 where the radioactivity of uranium was reduced over half in less than two hours by the Patterson Power Cell. Dr. Mallove's Infinite Energy Magazine http://www.infinite-energy.com and the peer reviewed publications of the Institute for New Energy edited by Hal Fox http://www.padrak.com/ine provide additional and more technical details on latest research in these areas. I suspect that Mr. Nader has the experience and background to appreciate the government/corporate dynamics factors which have been hindering the development of these new energy technologies over the past two decades of my interest and involvement in this area of research. He may also appreciate the reference in Jeane Manning's book to the government secrecy orders under which she claims these new developments are being ordered secret and suppressed, austensibly for national security reasons but apparently to protect entrenched corporate profiteering and energy industry global economics and governments control. For additional references among cc's above for more information you may also want to check with Col. Bearden and Moray King regarding details on Zero Point Energy perspectives on this new science; with Thomas Valone of Integrity Research Institute there in Washington DC who has done some conferences there on this topic; with Randell Mills of Blacklight Power ; with systems theory and radar pioneer Dr. Fred B. Wood, Sr., who is worried about secrecy policies on this new science as relates to covert advanced electromagnetic weaponry potentially under development by the US and perhaps even more advanced in countries hostile to the US; and with Dr. Jack Sarfatti who with the support of former US West CEO Joseph Firmage is making rapid progress via global internetwork of researchers on the advanced theoretical physics of new energy and vacuum propulsion technologies especially as connected to physics of consciousness research and investigation of purported reverse engineering of UFO technologies . Mr. Firmage's new personal assistant, Andrew Mount, was for 9 years the personal assistant of the late Bruce DePalma whose research leading to the 1979 tests of the n-Machine "free-energy generator" mentioned on p.57 of DOE's CNES http://www.depalma.pair.com also has antigravity technology implications. He and Adam Trombly with Project Earth , who patented internationally one Zero Point Energy generator, both reported death threats since the early 1980's over suppression of this new science. Although this new energy science is still very controversial since the experimental results have not yet been reconciled in the "mainstream scientific establishment" with commonly accepted 20th century theoretical physics (eg, ), nevertheless I strongly urge you to consider the underlying potential and voluminous evidence available and insist that this topic become more deeply investigated and that it become a main topic of discussion in this year's Presidential and Congressional elections. Nowhere is this controversy more evident, and the lack of common agreement among these new energy researchers as to how all these different results and theories can be understood in common terms, than in the work over the last three decades of inventor Joseph Newman from Mississippi now living near Phoenix, Arizona . His experimental results on the Newman Energy Machine, contrary to Mr. Newman's theoretical understandings, seem to some influential scientists as "violating the laws of physics". Even so, he gained sufficient testimonies from top scientists who witnessed tests of his energy machine that by the 1980's he earned the support of the Republican Congressional Caucus and 11 different Members of the House of Representatives separately introduced (unsuccessful) bills into Congress to give him a patent by congressional act to over-ride an intransigent US Patent Office's refusal. Today he is marketing a production model of his energy machine apparently under NAFTA-guaranteed foreign patent protection. [note/addendum of 7Apr00: Correct or not, Mr. Newman's theoretical understanding of how his generator works is by converting a small amount of matter (copper?) into a large amount of electricity in his device, which sounds a lot better than doing this with uranium or plutonium in nuclear reactors] Please ask Mr. Nader and his staff to carefully and thoroughly investigate this information as soon as possible. He is in a position, by his candidacy now gaining momentum for the US Presidency, to insert this information into the national election arena and compel all candidates and the public to push for rapid implemetation of this new science which has the potential to help end energy industry pollutions, more fairly restructure the global economy, and help ameliorate global environmental threats before it is too late to save all life on Earth from otherwise certain destruction. Finally, I would invite Mr. Nader to offer his letter of support for Global Peace Walk 2000 with his message which this walk to Washington DC and the United Nations can help publicize and carry for delivery with other such messages in Washington DC and to the United Nations for its 55th anniversary and to help inaugurate the UN Year and Decade of Creating a Culture of Peace for the 21st Century. Since Global Peace Walk 2000 will be conducting en route its annual April 22nd event in Taos, New Mexico, as one of the many global EarthDay2000 events, as soon as we receive Mr. Nader's letter we would like to send it to all the EarthDay network organizers and ask that they copy it and references to above new "Clean Energy Now!" information to their EarthDay2000 event attendees. With the support of some of those cc'd above we are planning to have a major conference on these new energy technologies in Washington DC toward the end of the first week of October just preceding the walk's arrival there for a ceremony October 9th to rededicate the Washington Monument as a symbol of the message of peace. We hope you will commit to attend this ceremony and that those receiving this post will help us achieve the goal of gathering over one million people for that ceremony including prominent politicial officeholders and candidates. With my fervent prayers for your serious consideration and response to the above suggestions as soon as possible, and appreciating your website at http://www.votenader.com, Sincerely, CLEAN-ENERGY CAMPAIGN 2000 David Crockett Williams gear2000@lightspeed.net Bachelor of Science, Chemistry (CSUN, CA, 1969) Chartered Life Underwriter (American College, PA, 1971) Independent Candidate for United States President 2000 Leonard Peltier, Vice Presidential Candidate USCampaign gear2000@onemain.com http://www.egroups.com/group/williams-peltier GLOBAL EMERGENCY ALERT RESPONSE http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000 Global Peace Walk 2000 http://www.globalpeacenow.org http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/gpw.html Updates 415-267-1877 -- Voicemail 415-863-2084 http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/schedule.html SCHEDULE & contacts The Vision of Paradise on Earth http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/vision.html **Support HR 2545: Global Nuclear Disarmament & Economic Conversion Act Details & Email: http://prop1.org/prop1/letter.htm Sign letters to senators http://prop1.org/prop1/letter.htm#senate and Representatives http://prop1.org/prop1/letter.htm#letter Easy index to email Congress & Media http://congress.nw.dc.us/wnd (copy & paste email letters to media and Congress) An Agenda for Peace http://www.angelfire.com/on/GEAR2000/agenda.html - - To unsubscribe to abolition-usa, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe abolition-usa" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message. ------------------------------ End of abolition-usa-digest V1 #284 *********************************** - To unsubscribe to $LIST, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe $LIST" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.